|
Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat with U.S. envoy Gen. Anthony C. Zinni in 2002
|
|
It is a rule of thumb that has been tried and tested many times over
the last 2,000 years. When things go bad, blame the Jews. So it can
hardly be termed a surprise that the problems that have arisen for the
United States in Iraq have led some of the conflict's fiercest critics
to trot out the same bag of tired tricks. When in doubt, they always
turn to the familiar refrain of thinly and not-so-thinly veiled canards
directed at Israel and the Jews.
The Abu Ghraib prisoner-abuse scandal, accompanied by a rise in
insurgent violence in Iraq, has left the Bush administration looking
shaky. But these setbacks aren't sufficient for the partisans and
radicals determined to end the war on terror, and to return the country
to its pre-Sept. 11 indifference to the Islamist assault on America.
From the beginning of the debate over Iraq, discrediting some
of the war's more prominent architects has always meant one thing:
smearing them as Zionist tools determined to drag America into a war
for Israel's sake. It is a now familiar rhetorical drill: Claim that
the war is an invention of the "neoconservatives," then produce a
roster of the neocons that is solely inhabited by Jews.
Diplomatic flop turns accuser
The latest instance of this little trick was seen Sunday night on
the CBS news show "60 Minutes," which featured a softball interview
with retired Marine Gen. Anthony C. Zinni. Zinni rose briefly to fame
in 2002 during a brief stint as Washington's envoy to the Middle East,
an experience that gave new meaning to the word fiasco. The man was so
ineffective that the post itself was obsolescent. The general who'd
helped inflame Arab expectations that the U.S. would pressure Israel to
appease Palestinian terrorists dropped from the public eye.
But there's no keeping a publicity-hungry ex-military man down.
Zinni used the commencement of the war in Iraq to begin to try and even
the score with his political foes inside the Pentagon. This campaign of
self-aggrandizement via anti-war rhetoric has now reached its climax
with the publication of a book (co-authored by techno-thriller maven
Tom Clancy), coupled with the "60 Minutes" interview.
Correspondent Steve Croft played right into Zinni's hands as he
described the Iraq invasion planners as "a group of policymakers within
the administration known as 'the neoconservatives,' who saw the
invasion of Iraq as a way to stabilize American interests in the region
and strengthen the position of Israel. They include Deputy Defense
Secretary Paul Wolfowitz; Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith;
Former Defense Policy Board member Richard Perle; National Security Council
member Eliot Abrams; and Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis
'Scooter' Libby."
Following in the footsteps of other media outlets, including
Business Week, that have played the same tune, Croft managed to list
only those members of the administration who are Jewish. That's a neat
trick when you remember that neither Bush, Cheney, Secretary of Defense
Donald H. Rumsfeld nor any member of the Cabinet is Jewish. Nor did he
mention the fact that a broad cross-section of the defense and
intelligence establishment viewed Iraq and Saddam Hussein as threats to
U.S. security and to the security of "moderate" Arab states.
Responding to previous criticisms of his singling out Jews,
Zinni stretched his thin supply of credibility to the breaking point:
"Because I mentioned the neoconservatives ... I was called anti-Semitic. I
certainly didn't criticize who they were. I certainly don't know what their
ethnic religious backgrounds are. And I'm not interested."
Given the confrontational culture of the
"60 Minutes" genre,
you would have expected Croft to nail Zinni for uttering such
disingenuous tripe. At the very least, you would expect a follow-up
question. But just because he plays "journalist" on television — like
the rest of "60 Minutes" on-screen celebrities — doesn't mean he
actually practices the craft of journalism. Zinni was allowed to get
away with not only spreading a whopper of a lie, he wasn't even
challenged to defend it.
Zinni's screed is, of course, just the tip of a growing
anti-Semitic iceberg that stands ready to sink public discourse on the
war into a morass of hate.
Other recent entries in the "blame the Jews" derby included
Sen. Ernest "Fritz" Hollings (D-S.C.), who told the Senate that the
American Israel Public Affairs Committee has been dictating policy to
the White House and Congress for decades, and that the reason the Bush
administration went to war was to gain Jewish votes.
Days later, another variation on the theme was voiced by United
Press International editor-at-large Arnaud de Borchgrave, who wrote in
a May 24 column in The Washington Times that the reason Iraqi
politician Ahmad Chalabi was dropped by his former sponsors in the
Pentagon is that he had reneged on a pledge to recognize Israel and
sign a peace treaty with the Jewish state once he was installed in
power in Baghdad.
Jews control everything?
The embattled Chalabi was never in any position to make good on
such a pledge, and it's highly unlikely that the Pentagon demanded he
even do any such thing. But if, like de Borchgrave, you are a longtime
critic of Israel, anything — even an unsubstantiated story like this
one — is fair game.
And for those who are fascinated with the bizarre anti-Israel
slurs circulated in the Arab media, such as the disgusting lie that
Israel was behind the Sept. 11 terror acts, another example has popped
up. The conservative Web site NewsMax.com circulated a story on May 24
that claimed 'Israeli nationals' were behind the Iraq prison
controversy. The unattributed report proved once again that in the
anti-Semitic mindset, everything — even the perversions of
out-of-control American reservists — can be blamed on Israel or the
Jews.
Whether or not the war in Iraq proves to be a success (and
heaven help the Middle East if our Islamist foes win), the idea that
this project was all an Israeli plot is an obvious falsehood. Whatever
possible gains in security the war inadvertently made for Israel are
far outweighed by the potential boost to the American security and
regional stability.
Should the tables turn in the coming months and American
strategy is seen as succeeding in Iraq, you can expect to hear talk of
Jewish plots cease. But don't worry, the next time anything else goes
wrong, we know whose heads are going to be offered up on a plate.
Jonathan S. Tobin can be reached via e-mail at: jtobin@jewishexponent.com.